Minnesotans pay more in Federal taxes - and get least benefit
We Minnesotans get the least amount back in paying our taxes than most states. The only state to get less in per-capita spending was Nevada. Nevada is a state without a state income tax - making it the state with the smallest government in America. ( Nevada also boasts the fast-growing and unsustainable Las Vegas )
Minnesotans pay $4409 per-capita in state and local taxes.Minnesota pays the 4th highest Federal taxes per capita in the US - $2,888.63. For every dollar Minnesotans pay in Federal Income Taxes - we get about 76 cents.
Obviously we are propping up neighboring states and then "stealing" their intellectual talent. But nonetheless - I would appreciate a more regional approach to spending tax dollars than what we currently have. We should keep the dollars flowing in a balanced fashion by region. But then Washington D. C might have to cut back.
Monday, December 26, 2005
Growing the Windustry
We Minnesotans have a very valuable asset in the 21st Century energy market - wind. We have over 700 turbines churning on the Buffalo Ridge. Unfortunately, only about 35 are Minnesota owned. Obviously if we want our energy to be used for Minnesota - our state citizens will have to start investing in it. There are a few options to do this: investing in companies like Winfinity , Project Resources Corporation,and Dan Mar Associates. Also every utility in Minnesota is required to purchase wind powe. Xcel Energy will produce 800 megawatts a year by 2013. (I will add more investment opportunities if I am informed of others )
Currently Minnesota produces 615 megawatts a year from wind. Obviously this will grow as demand for renewable energy grows and incentives to produce them become more serious in nature. ALL Minnesotans can support wind through their current utility company. It costs me little more than $2 a month. And it is easy to participate if you contact them. I hope that more will invest in our future and our planet's sustainability. Maybe you could make it part of your New Year resolution?
Friday, December 23, 2005
I have been reading about pharmacists who feel they have an unpaid duty. They must enforce their religious beliefs on others. Birth control prescriptions and ritalin will not be filled when they are on the job! Same thing with that herpes medication - it's their punishment after all! Of course this does mean one is robbing potential patrons of their individual rights - but one has to impose their moral causes.
The interesting thing is that pharmacists feel they should have this right.
HCD Research surveyed more than 850 pharmacists earlier this month.
Among the newly released findings:
- Nearly 70 percent indicated that they and their peers should have the authority to refuse filling prescriptions for emergency contraception;
- Nearly 40 percent believe state laws should not require them to fill certain prescriptions;
- Only 23 percent feel that a patient's rights should prevail over their objections.
But this cannot be so - businesses wouldn't go along with this! They have to treat all customers the same - and give them what they want -right? Not quite so. It seems pharmacists have better moral judgement than other professions. They can decide what pills to hand out and what not - based on their own discretion. And a few corporations are standing by whatever they wish to enforce on others.
Chain stores that support activist pharmacists with written policy are: Wal-Mart , Target, Walgreens, and Rite Aid. Those who support customers needs are: Costco , CVS , Brooks Pharmacy, K-Mart, Supervalu, Fagen's Pharmacy, Harris Teeter, and Price Chopper. All others have not made known their current policies. Links to the activist corporations go to their customer service website. I encourage anyone reading this to send them a note - whether you agree or disagree - and include an intellectual analysis.
But organizations representing pharmacists do not support the growing activism. The Minnesota Pharmacists Association replied to an e-mail I sent them. I mainly expressed that pharmacists would be taking away others individual rights and that moral judgement should not be part of the pharmaceutical profession. The reply:
We do [ feel the same way ] and we're working on it [ activist pharmacists issue] . Agree with you on all points. Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us.